Addendum: One of the interesting points that is raised in this programme is the
fact that we could feed the world now - it's a case of redistribution and waste
management, not production. No clearer example exists where our economic
paradigms are in conflict with our global needs. The wealth gap simply forbids
it.
Philosophy, at its best, challenges our long held views, such that we examine them more deeply than we might otherwise consider.
Paul P. Mealing
- Paul P. Mealing
- Check out my book, ELVENE. Available as e-book and as paperback (print on demand, POD). Also this promotional Q&A on-line.
Saturday, 8 June 2013
Why there should be more science in politics
This programme aired on
ABC's Catalyst last Thursday illustrates this very well. Not only are
scientists best equipped to see the future on global terms, they are best
equipped to find solutions. I think there is a complacency amongst both
politicians and the public-at-large that science will automatically rescue us
from the problems inherent in our global species' domination. But it seems to
me that our economic policies and our scientific future-seeing are at odds.
Infinite economic growth dependent on infinite population growth is not
sustainable. As the programme intimates, the 21st Century will be a crunch
point, and whilst everyone just assumes that science and technology will see us
through, it's only the scientists who actually acknowledge the problem.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment