tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3427479692989285926.post8419225163206044858..comments2024-03-17T11:54:10.124+11:00Comments on Journeyman Philosopher: Is there a God?Paul P. Mealinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14573615711151742992noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3427479692989285926.post-23546519928452776252008-06-20T20:21:00.000+10:002008-06-20T20:21:00.000+10:00Thanks Nathan,As I said in my post, God is a very ...Thanks Nathan,<BR/><BR/>As I said in my post, God is a very subjective issue. What I believe is often overlooked in this debate, is that God is an experience that is unique to the person who has it, therefore different people have different ideas of what God is.<BR/><BR/>It is obvious, from observation alone, that not everyone, who are theists, believe in the same God, or have the same idea of what or who God is. <BR/><BR/>Agnosticism, as you’ve expressed it, is purely an intellectual position. I probably would have called myself an agnostic once, but I don’t think I ever really was.<BR/><BR/>I would recommend Victor Frankl’s book, The Unconscious God, for a refreshing and unusual perspective on this subject.Paul P. Mealinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14573615711151742992noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3427479692989285926.post-42832349737397366502008-06-20T05:40:00.000+10:002008-06-20T05:40:00.000+10:00Both atheists and theists make a huge assumption. ...Both atheists and theists make a huge assumption. One assumes that god doesn't exist, and the other assumes God does.<BR/><BR/>Neither of these assumptions are better really. In both cases you don't have 100% proof and yet still act in accordance. <BR/><BR/>I think the only belief that could consider itself superior would be that of a form of agnosticism. One in which the bearer held no assumptions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com